|
NEWS RELEASE
Who's Watching
the Watchdog?
Rebecca Otto audits the State
Auditor; says report on Counties contains dozens of accounting errors
Announcement follows days after
Otto found $12 million education
error
__________________________
Wednesday, April 12, 2006
Saint Paul, MN -- An official report on county finances issued March 2
by State Auditor Patricia Anderson contains financial errors, says State
Auditor candidate Rebecca Otto.
Otto’s statement follows closely on the heels of her announcement on
April 6 that there was a $12 million error in MN Dept of Education
financial reporting of school district revenues. That report has since
been amended due to Otto’s discovery.
The State Auditor’s web site says the office serves to ensure financial
integrity, accountability, and cost-effectiveness of Minnesota's local
governmental entities, including counties and school districts.
In examining the State Auditor’s county report, Otto says, she noticed
that Table 9, a listing of changes in county reserve fund balances,
listed incorrect percentages over 80% of the time.
Otto said this error is especially surprising because reserve fund
balances is an area Anderson singled out to criticize local officials
about in 2003.
Otto said she went back and checked the year 2000 version of the Table
9, prepared under former State Auditor Judi Dutcher, and found no errors
in the percent changes.
Otto said that Table 9 isn’t the only portion of the report that is in
error. “It’s just one example. Another one is in the 2005 and 2006
county budget summaries. The State Auditor has incorrectly added Norman
county’s amended current expenses, and overstated them by $2,976.”
Otto, a former State Representative, said she is concerned because of
the pattern of errors. “Whether it’s $2,976 or $12 million, finding
these errors makes you wonder how many others there might be.”
And this, she said, poses a problem. “If policymakers can’t count on the
numbers, they can’t make informed decisions. The public should be able
to count on the integrity of the numbers that the State Auditor’s office
is reporting without feeling like they have to double-check everything.
That’s why we have a State Auditor.”
The question now, says Otto, is “who’s watching the watchdog?”
###
The corrected Table 9 detailing the errors and comparing
the 2004 Table 9 with the 2000 Table 9 is
here
(76k)
The original State Auditor’s
official report "Minnesota County Finances 2004 Revenues,
Expenditures, and Debt & 2005 and 2006 Summary Budgets" published on
March 2 has been archived and can be downloaded from
here
(3.3 meg)
|