|
Reprinted
from

Otto looks to unseat Anderson as auditor
For DFL auditor candidate, it's all in the numbers
By BILL HANNA
Mesabi Daily News
Saturday, October 07th, 2006
VIRGINIA — Rebecca Otto says the numbers just don’t add up when she
looks at the tenure the last four years of her opponent, Republican
state Auditor Patricia Anderson.
And the Democrat and former state representative from the Stillwater
area hopes that adds up to a numbers victory at the polls on Nov. 7.
“The auditor should be someone who works with local governments and
helps them when necessary. She should not be someone who champions a cut
in Local Government Aid and then tries to tell counties and cities that
they are better off and local property taxes would have gone up anyway,”
Otto said during a recent campaign visit to the Iron Range.
Otto was referring to Anderson’s activist’s role in promoting and
helping push through the Legislature large LGA cuts more than three
years ago to help solve the state’s $4.5 billion budget deficit.
According to Otto, that resulted in property taxes going up $2.1
billion, while taxpayers faced another $1.2 billion in fee increases.
“All that did was increase property taxes on a local level. It was a
shell game with numbers that really hurt those that most need that aid
returned from St. Paul,” Otto said.
Otto travels on the campaign trail armed with documentation of numbers
that she says represents Anderson’s misrepresentation of accurate
figures. She even has a four-page sheet that’s labeled “State Auditor
Times.” The headlines are about numbers:
“Rebecca Otto discovers $12 million error in MN Dept. of Education
fiscal report.”
“3 laptops with sensitive identity info stolen from Auditor’s office.”
“The history of ‘no new taxes’ in Minnesota.”
“A ‘property tax’ grab.”
“No new tax rhetoric drives fees up.”
“School property taxes nearly double.”
And those are only part of the headlines, with several graphics
accompanying the copy.
There are no shades of gray in the candidates’ disagreement on the LGA
issue. In an earlier interview, Anderson claims with pride her role in
successfully advocating for the cuts. Otto is adamant in just how
hurtful she believes they are to communities.
“Everyone had to share the pain when we had such a huge deficit. That
was the reality and some hard decisions needed to be made,” Anderson
said.
“That is just plain wrong. It was all part of the cover for a governor
who pledged no new tax increases and then shifted that burden onto local
property taxes, not to mention all the fee increases,” Otto said.
“She advocated the governor’s agenda and is proud of it. Meanwhile,
communities had to cut everything from public safety to local health
care. It was good for some of the more well-off communities, but not for
the entire state. That’s not supposed to be the role of a state
auditor.”
Otto said she would bring a different style to the office.
“I will be a true watchdog for all local governments. And I will work
with them, not against them,” she said.
|